Gene editing debate consequential for organic markets

Gene editing debate consequential for organic markets

At the core of organic farming practices is science, but this does not dictate consumer sentiment as much as perception.  Buyers are choosing to purchase an option that costs more, but aligns with their values, though at times there may be a disconnect between a consumer’s understanding of farming practices and the reality in the field.

Gene editing is an area that will challenge organic stakeholders more as science advances.  The implications for organic markets are substantial.  The ability to manage pests and disease using CRISPR-Cas9 accelerates an adaptation process that can take many years vis-à-vis conventional plant breeding.

Membership is required to view the rest of this post.
Click here to learn more and sign up for a free 7-day trial!

Blog

11.21.2024

Domestic US biodiesel blending helps lift October RFS RIN production

Domestic US biodiesel blending helps lift October RFS RIN production

US domestic biodiesel blending of 147.5 million gallons in October produced a monthly high of 221.2 million renewable identification number (RIN) credits for January-October. This was 11.5% above September...

11.21.2024

CWG trades lower as broader animal fats markets hold steady

CWG trades lower as broader animal fats markets hold steady

The US animal fats and oils markets held steady on Thursday November 21, with limited trading as attention shifted toward broader macroeconomic factors and...

11.21.2024

October commercial cattle, hog production above 2023

October commercial cattle, hog production above 2023

US animal protein prices were steady on Thursday November 21. Limited trade was reported from market sources due to the proximity of the extended Thanksgiving holiday weekend in the...

Latest Tweets