Gene editing debate consequential for organic markets

Gene editing debate consequential for organic markets

At the core of organic farming practices is science, but this does not dictate consumer sentiment as much as perception.  Buyers are choosing to purchase an option that costs more, but aligns with their values, though at times there may be a disconnect between a consumer’s understanding of farming practices and the reality in the field.

Gene editing is an area that will challenge organic stakeholders more as science advances.  The implications for organic markets are substantial.  The ability to manage pests and disease using CRISPR-Cas9 accelerates an adaptation process that can take many years vis-à-vis conventional plant breeding.

Membership is required to view the rest of this post.
Click here to learn more and sign up for a free 7-day trial!

Blog

04.26.2024

P66 Rodeo to begin producing SAF in Q3

P66 Rodeo to begin producing SAF in Q3

Phillips 66 brought its long-awaited Rodeo Renewable Energy Complex online during the first quarter of 2024, but it is not producing sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) yet, the company said...

04.26.2024

Slower Gulf demand weighs on animal fats market

Slower Gulf demand weighs on animal fats market

Limited volumes of choice white grease traded at steady prices on Friday April 26, while trading was very quiet outside of the choice white grease market.

Price direction in...

04.26.2024

Porcine bloodmeal FOB Missouri River price drops week on week

Porcine bloodmeal FOB Missouri River price drops week on week

Limited trade was reported on Friday April 26 for US animal proteins, while prices widened downward.

Fastmarkets assessed bloodmeal, porcine, fob Iowa/Missouri/Nebraska at $1,025-1,150 per short ton on...

Latest Tweets